🔗 Share this article

This week represented a critical juncture in the continuing political use of the United States' armed forces, as the president delivered a highly partisan political address to an unprecedented gathering of senior defense officials.

Alarm Bells and Authoritarian Rhetoric

For observers worried about democratic norms, several warning signs appeared during the speech: anti-progressive language typical on the political right, warnings to remove military leaders who disagree, and open pleasure about using armed services for internal police actions.

The secrecy surrounding this rare meeting of military leaders, some of whom were recalled from overseas deployments, sparked rumors about potential significant shifts in defense strategy.

Substance Versus Show

Yet, similar to numerous administration actions, questions remain about to what extent of the meeting was substantive planning versus made-for-TV drama.

Following a secret summons to about 800 top defense officials globally, the president and Pete Hegseth presented a ten-item agenda covering everything from using troops in cities to complaints about senior officers.

"Democratic leaders govern the majority of the cities that are in bad shape," the president said. "What they've done to SF, Chicago, NYC, LA, these cities are very unsafe places and we're going to straighten them out one by one."

Armed Forces as Domestic Tool

Unambiguous statements came through: that America's armed forces serves at the president's pleasure, and that their fresh focus means internal use rather than overseas missions.

"This represents conflict internally," Trump added. Later he suggested that US urban areas should become "practice areas" for armed forces activities.

Culture War Fights and Military Culture

Yet these policy statements were overshadowed by extended speeches focusing primarily on cultural issues and military appearance.

Before the president's standard campaign speech, the defense secretary attacked inclusion programs in rhetoric clearly designed to appeal to Trump's core supporters.

"No more heritage celebrations, diversity departments, men in women's clothing," the secretary stated. "Stop global warming worship. Eliminate divisiveness, distraction or gender delusions. As I've said before and will state once more, we are done with those policies."

Armed Forces Reaction and Assessment

Among military leadership, one prevailing feeling was that it could have been more severe. Several had feared loyalty pledges or swift purges of top commanders.

"The most significant development was what did not happen," observed an assessment from a DC research organization. "We saw no removal of military leaders, no changes in the pledge of office, and no demands that command staff endorse partisan policies."

The reaction among senior officers was not uniformly supportive. A senior official apparently remarked that the meeting could have been a memo, characterizing it as closer to a political event than an important briefing.

Wider Background and International Worries

This incident represents yet another time the president has faced accusations of using armed forces as a political backdrop. Comparable concerns arose in June when active-duty military personnel appeared during an address where Trump criticized political opponents.

Yet, this week's gathering at the Virginia base was notable for its blunt approach and the participation of senior military leaders from around the world.

"The messages coming loud and clear from this government suggest they are much more comfortable with domestic armed forces use than earlier administrations," wrote a defense analyst from an international research institute.

Although several of the proposed changes remain verbal for now, international leaders including church leaders have voiced worry about the implications of such language.

"This way of speaking is worrying because it shows a rise in conflict," stated a leading international figure. "Let's hope it's merely a manner of speaking."